On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 08:43:16AM +0200, Alex Rosenbaum wrote:
>
> So I'd like to see:
>
> struct ibv_parent_domain_init_attr {
> - struct ibv_pd *pd; /* referance to a protection domain, or NULL */
> + struct ibv_pd *pd; /* referance to a protection domain, can not be NULL */
>
> And even if we did use the PD for consistency, it doesn't hurt at all
> to pass in a PD&TD to the CQ object and then have the CQ ignore the
> PD portion.
I see no problem with this direction.
We'll take it to next step now.
Thanks,
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
