It is too bad we can't re-size CQs.. Can we?
I wish we could, but its an optional feature so I can't see how we can
use it.
Well, it looks like mlx4/5 can do it, which covers a huge swath of
deployed hardware..
I'd say make an optimal implementation using resize_cq and just a working
implementation without it?
I can experiment with it, sure. Do you think that its a must have for
first phase though?
The only way to encourage vendors to implement optional features is to
actually use them in the OS...
I agree with you on that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
