On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 10:37:54AM +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > >> Both send and recv completed only ever go from not set to set on a live >> requests, so that's easy. need_inval only goes from set to cleared >> so I'm not too worried about it either, but due to the lack of atomic >> bitops there it will need better memory barries, or just a switch >> to bitops.. >> >> But looking at this in a little more detail I wonder if we just want >> a recount on the nvme_rdma_request, untested patch below. > > I'll give it a shot. Btw, in our brave new world that should probably be a refcnt_t instead of an atomic_t, but that's a trivial search and replace. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
