On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 09:32:42PM +0200, Max Gurtovoy wrote: > > > On 11/16/2017 8:36 PM, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > > > > > Since there is an active discussion regarding the CQ pool > > > architecture, I decided to push > > > this feature (maybe it can be pushed before CQ pool). > > > > > > This is a new feature for NVMEoF RDMA target, > > > > Any chance having this for the rest? isert, srpt, svcrdma? > > > > We can implement it for isert, but I think it's better to see how the CQ > pool will be defined first. > It can bring a big benefit and improvement for ib_srpt (similar to NVMEoF > target) but I'm not sure if I can commit for that one soon.. Too bad, but I don't see inclusion of generic SRQ pool code in RDMA subsystem without actual conversion of existing ULP clients. Thanks -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
