On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 03:41:13PM -0500, Don Dutile wrote: > On 11/14/2017 02:08 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > However, it would of course be better to teach udma_barrier.h about > > > these architectures. > > > > The issue is that some architectures just can't do cache coherent DMA > > on any implementation. eg m68k > > > > There is no correct udma_barrier.h at all in those cases. > > > > We need to teach debian to follow cmake and exclude the missing > > installables in these cases.. > > > > Or do not build at all on these arch's.. > > > > Jason > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > Jason: > Why am I being cc'd on this debian bug? > I also received a notice about a bug fix in debian, and I had zip to do with it. > > Is my name tagged in Debian wrt rdma for some reason? by someone? other? Don, All of us received this email [1], because maintainer of rdma-core package is mailing list: "Package: src:rdma-core; Maintainer for src:rdma-core is Linux RDMA Mailing List <linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;" [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=881731 Thanks > > -dd > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
