On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:51:09PM +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote: > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Erez Shitrit <erezsh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > If from some reason the SM responses to path query request with response > > that doesn't contain the exact SGID, ipoib should warn and change that > > part of the response before push it to the path record DB. > > Otherwise, new record will be added to the path record DB with no access > > to them from the ipoib. > > > > Demonstration of the bug is as the follow: > > this series contains bunch of fixes, any reason to direct them to > -next (4.16) and not -rc (4.15) Doug didn't send his pull request yet and most probably we will have two pull requests in this merge window, one with already accepted code and another with fixes from Denny and us. So all these patches are targeted for 4.15. > > Also, in most of the cases ppl didn't provide a Fixes: line with the > offending patch, any reason to skip that? There are two main reasons: 1. I didn't request to add Fixes for refactoring code (most Parav's patches), because I don't want that code to be picked for stable@ trees by Greg's and Sasha's automatic scripts. 2. Sometimes, it is not clear the origin of the bug and the chances to have wrong Fixes are higher than to have right ones. Everything else is my mistake during review. Can you point me to specific commits where you would like to see Fixes with right Fixes? I'll add. Thanks
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature