On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 09:00:29PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 08:27:20PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:51:43AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > The commit 25f07300bfb7 ("vmw_pvrdma: Add SRQ support") causes to build
> > > failures in Travis CI [1] and on my system too [2].
> > >
> > > Please fix.
> >
> > I reverted the commit, please fix compilation error and resubmit.
> >
> > Commit: 32bf4efb8605 ("Revert "vmw_pvrdma: Add SRQ support" because it causes build failures")
>
> Just as a pointer, it fails on the systems with kernel's include/uapi/rdma/vmw_pvrdma-abi.h
> file available, so fixup is not applied but without your definition yet.
Thanks for the notice, I should have tried building on a kernel without
the updated ABI header. We had a question though, what would be the best
approach to fix this? We didn't bump up the ABI version after discussion
on the pull request. Is there a way for the fixup to be included if
there is an ABI version mismatch, or if a macro is not defined (in this
case, PVRDMA_UAR_SRQ_OFFSET)? I thought that we'd use the fixup over the
ABI header exposed by the kernel, but my assumption there was wrong.
> > Thanks
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
