On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 05:19:46PM +0100, Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin wrote: > > > Le 13/11/2017 à 16:14, Leon Romanovsky a écrit : > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 04:02:26PM +0100, Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> After looking into the ML, here are the candidates for the stable-v15 branch. > >> Can the authors please confirm that they should be applied there ? > >> > >> Please let me know if I missed any. > > In addition to the your list, I would like to see the following patches too: > > commit dbf7bd2151815a12428caef6874149523c0bda8e > > Author: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Wed Oct 25 12:04:53 2017 +0300 > > > > verbs: Fix declaration of C++ include file in C-block > > > > commit 6a74285158a146f23cbf8a804fd9de32df0d5ed2 > > Author: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Mon Oct 9 10:56:21 2017 +0300 > > > > verbs: Fix C++ compilation break > > > > commit 983f80191923c082324295ea68ac91d34daaa4c8 > > Author: Nelio Laranjeiro <nelio.laranjeiro@xxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Tue Sep 26 16:05:11 2017 +0200 > > > > verbs: fix compilation error with ICC > > > > commit bf03566e0aa976afc5dfbf917296280e9fa55bb8 > > Author: Wei Hu (Xavier) <xavier.huwei@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Mon Oct 2 04:17:09 2017 +0800 > > > > hns: Fix create QP structure layout > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Added to the list. > Should we backport the changes done for travis validation ? > It doesn't impact the code per say but it'd be nice to have the same validation running in the stable branch. It depends on the easiest path: backport CI to stable, or teach main CI to run for stable too. Thanks > > Nicolas >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
