On Thu, 2017-11-02 at 15:51 +0200, Yuval Shaia wrote:
> The check makes no difference - remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> librdmacm/cma.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/librdmacm/cma.c b/librdmacm/cma.c
> index 7aaf45f2..6eebe71b 100644
> --- a/librdmacm/cma.c
> +++ b/librdmacm/cma.c
> @@ -880,8 +880,8 @@ static int rdma_resolve_addr2(struct rdma_cm_id *id, struct sockaddr *src_addr,
> CMA_INIT_CMD(&cmd, sizeof cmd, RESOLVE_ADDR);
> id_priv = container_of(id, struct cma_id_private, id);
> cmd.id = id_priv->handle;
> - if ((cmd.src_size = src_len))
> - memcpy(&cmd.src_addr, src_addr, src_len);
> + cmd.src_size = src_len;
> + memcpy(&cmd.src_addr, src_addr, src_len);
> memcpy(&cmd.dst_addr, dst_addr, dst_len);
> cmd.dst_size = dst_len;
> cmd.timeout_ms = timeout_ms;
Shouldn't the description have been "Passing zero as third argument to
memcpy() is allowed so the if-test is not necessary. Hence leave it out"?
Bart.��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���fk��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
