Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix request completion holes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




(3) No send signal with invalidation signal w/o moderation 5.2M / 8.3M

Actually, isn't this valid and reasonable? You don't need to see the
SEND completion, the only thing that matters is the invalidate
completion, and the invalidate will naturally order after the send
is finished, yes?

the default mode utilize remote invalidation, so no, its not valid.

Without remote invalidate I'm not sure, don't remember the ordering
rules from the top of my head. Idan, does a local invalidate completion
guarantee a prior send completion (of a non-related buffer)? I vaguely
remember that explicit fencing is required to guarantee that.

I guess we could not signal send completions if we are in a local
invalidate mode, but I'm liking this less and less...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux