On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 12:20:27PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote: > On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 18:40 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 11:25:09AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote: > > > On Mon, 2017-10-16 at 08:45 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > > The patches are available in the git repository at: > > > > git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/leon/linux-rdma.git > > > > tags/rdma-next-2017-10-16 > > > > > > This branch is unpullable for me. Trying to pull this on top of > > > the > > > shared pull request brings in a ton of other stuff. My diffstat > > > ends > > > up looking like this: > > > > <....> > > > > > > > > So, with a shared pull request, your submissions either need to be > > > against that shared pull request, or against my for-next, and you > > > need > > > to let me know which one it is. > > > > I didn't know that you are using this as a pull request, we tried it > > in > > last cycle and it didn't truly work, so I stopped it and changed the > > title > > (instead of pull requests, it is patches now), removed invitation to > > pull from > > the cover letter and prepared the series (with tags) as standalone > > patches > > and not as pull request. > > OK, but you still had the pull request URL in the cover letter, so I > tried it. Anyway, not a big deal as far as that goes. > > > > > > > I can grab these out of patchworks, but even that way I still need > > > you > > > to be clear about what tree/branch these are intended to be applied > > > to. > > > > It should apply cleanly as patches grabbed from the patchworks and if > > for any reasons it doesn't work for you, please drop it and I'll > > resubmit. > > Apply cleanly where? That was the other part of my email. When you > have a shared pull request, and it isn't based on my for-next branch > (as this one isn't), please let me know in each patch series whether > you intend it to be applied on the shared pull request or my for-next > branch. You did the right thing by applying it on shared pull request, thanks. All my submissions are based on shared pull request, just to be on the safe side. > > I actually applied it to the shared pull request branch, but I didn't > know if that's what you had intended. Also, I rewrote the commit > message in patch 5/6 entirely. But, otherwise, thanks, applied. Thanks again, I appreciate your help. > > -- > Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx> > GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD > Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
