On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 10:05:19PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > It means that your glibc is new enough. > On some systems, the stdint.h contains the following ifdef to protect UINTPTR_MAX > "#if !defined __cplusplus || defined __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS" Ah, that old thing. __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS is removed from the latest standards, and IIRC, including cstdint isn't even enough to reliably get the macros under the old standards. The commit comment should describe the problem in these terms.. So this is the best fix: > > #ifdef __cplusplus > > #include <limits> > > #define __VERBS_ABI_IS_EXTENDED ((void *)std::numeric_limits<uintptr_t>::max()) > > #else > > #define __VERBS_ABI_IS_EXTENDED ((void *)UINTPTR_MAX) > > #endif Because numeric_limits is never subject to __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
