On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 02:48:42PM +0300, Yishai Hadas wrote: > Resource domain represents a collection of IB resources (as of QP, CQ, > etc.) which are accessed by an application from the same context (e.g. > same thread) and as such can share hardware and software resources to > allow smarter management of resources by the provider library and better > performance. This sounds exactly like a PD to me. Why do we need another construct? What is wrong with a 'thread-unsafe' flag during PD creation and then contain the shared resources in the PD? > uint32_t raw_packet_caps; /* Use ibv_raw_packet_caps */ > + uint32_t max_resource_domains; Even with this approach, not sure a max makes much sense, this value should just be hashed into whatever range the provider has on a resource by resource basis. Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
