On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 07:56:32AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 02:50:56PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > To avoid clashing with user variables. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > util/util.h | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/util/util.h b/util/util.h > > index cbf0deca2dde7b..30d32ee6b51e24 100644 > > +++ b/util/util.h > > @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ > > * error */ > > #define check_snprintf(buf, len, fmt, ...) \ > > ({ \ > > - int rc = snprintf(buf, len, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \ > > - (rc < len && rc >= 0); \ > > + int __rc__ = snprintf(buf, len, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \ > > It can't clash, because it is declared in the scope {..} of that define and > it is local to check_snprintf macro. This triggers a -Wshadow warning: int rc; check_snprinf(str, sizeof(str), ..) And rc is commonly used in callers, so it shouldn't. Perhaps this addresses all the concerns: /* Return true if the snprintf succeeded, false if there was truncation or * error */ static inline bool __good_snprintf(size_t len, int rc) { return (rc < len && rc >= 0); } #define check_snprintf(buf, len, fmt, ...) \ __good_snprintf(len, snprintf(buf, len, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)) Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html