On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 04:09:50PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-08-15 at 11:54 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > From: Guy Levi <guyle@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > rss_key_len is not in use and need to be removed.
> >
> > Fixes: 3078f5f1bd8b ("IB/mlx4: Add support for RSS QP")
> > Signed-off-by: Guy Levi <guyle@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > include/uapi/rdma/mlx4-abi.h | 3 +--
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/rdma/mlx4-abi.h b/include/uapi/rdma/mlx4-
> > abi.h
> > index 0e10102861b5..c55f60e05f86 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/rdma/mlx4-abi.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/rdma/mlx4-abi.h
> > @@ -98,8 +98,7 @@ struct mlx4_ib_create_srq_resp {
> > struct mlx4_ib_create_qp_rss {
> > __u64 rx_hash_fields_mask;
> > __u8 rx_hash_function;
> > - __u8 rx_key_len;
> > - __u8 reserved[6];
> > + __u8 reserved[7];
>
> I believe Yuval's point, which has not been fixed, was not that you
> could remove the variable without increasing the reserved size. That
> makes sense. He was referring to the fact that you reference
> rss_key_len in the commit message, but what you removed was rx_key_len
> instead.
Ahh, I didn't understand it from his comment back then.
How do you want me to proceed here? Do you want me to resend all patches?
Do you want me to resend this patch only? Do you prefer to fix it by yourself?
It looks like we can declare working with pull-requests in RDMA as a failed
experiment.
>
> > __u8 rx_hash_key[40];
> > __u32 comp_mask;
> > __u32 reserved1;
> --
> Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
> GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
> Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
