Never mind. I read the other thread. > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-rdma-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-rdma- > owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Parav Pandit > Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2017 3:53 PM > To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Doug Ledford > <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Steve Wise <swise@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 0/2] Don't allocate ib/iw cm workqueues with > WQ_MEM_RECLAIM > > Hi Sagi, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: linux-rdma-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-rdma- > > owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sagi Grimberg > > Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2017 2:21 PM > > To: Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Cc: Steve Wise <swise@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] Don't allocate ib/iw cm workqueues with > > WQ_MEM_RECLAIM > > > > It's not correct due to the fact that such workqueues cannot allocate > > memory in their work execution by definition, which is definitly not > > the case for cm > Are you saying a work executed on a WQ which is created with > WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, cannot allocate memory? > Did I misread 'such workqueues cannot allocate memory'? > > > workqueues. > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body > of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at > https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fvger.ke > rnel.org%2Fmajordomo- > info.html&data=02%7C01%7Cparav%40mellanox.com%7C93927b0ff2eb41195a > 2208d4e41fa791%7Ca652971c7d2e4d9ba6a4d149256f461b%7C0%7C0%7C636 > 384272020352896&sdata=%2FgoMTFzzT1h9rc2WE04mHfU9RRiO415k3eylvl6M > OfI%3D&reserved=0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
