On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 10:14:07PM +0300, Yuval Shaia wrote: > On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 03:04:43PM +0000, Christian Benvenuti (benve) wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Yuval Shaia [mailto:yuval.shaia@xxxxxxxxxx] > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 6:03 AM > > > To: Christian Benvenuti (benve) > > > Cc: dledford@xxxxxxxxxx; sean.hefty@xxxxxxxxx; hal.rosenstock@xxxxxxxxx; > > > selvin.xavier@xxxxxxxxxxxx; devesh.sharma@xxxxxxxxxxxx; > > > somnath.kotur@xxxxxxxxxxxx; sriharsha.basavapatna@xxxxxxxxxxxx; Dave Goodell > > > (dgoodell); monis@xxxxxxxxxxxx; leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx; ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx; > > > dasaratharaman.chandramouli@xxxxxxxxx; sagi@xxxxxxxxxx; > > > bart.vanassche@xxxxxxxxxxx; yishaih@xxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] IB/core: Add generic function to extract IB speed > > > from netdev > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 08:07:48AM +0000, Christian Benvenuti (benve) wrote: > > > > > > > > > > +int ib_get_eth_speed(struct ib_device *dev, u8 port_num, u8 *speed, u8 > > > > > +*width) { > > > > > + int rc; > > > > > + u32 netdev_speed; > > > > > + struct net_device *netdev; > > > > > + struct ethtool_link_ksettings lksettings; > > > > > + > > > > > + if (rdma_port_get_link_layer(dev, port_num) != IB_LINK_LAYER_ETHERNET) > > > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > > > + > > > > > + if (!dev->get_netdev) > > > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > > > > > > -EOPNOTSUPP ? > > > > > > Looks better. > > > Assuming the same should be for the above one and the one below, right? > > > > I am not sure about the other two: > > - rdma_port_get_link_layer() does not entirely depend on ib_device->get_link_layer() > > - ib_device->get_netdev() can fail for different reasons I guess > > I see, > > So back to your proposal, the fact that dev->get_netdev is not set means > that the IB device is not relayed on Ethernet one (RoCE folks, correct me > if i'm wrong) so with the given input - the operation is not supported. Is > that means that -EINVAL is better than -EOPNOTSUPP? > > As far as the name suggest, EINVAL is where input values are wrong while > EOPNOTSUPP is where input values are fine but the operation is not > supported. Please ignore, i looked at some other places. Will post v4 soon. > > Yuval > > > > > /Chris > > > > > > > > > > > + netdev = dev->get_netdev(dev, port_num); > > > > > + if (!netdev) > > > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > > > + > > > > > + rtnl_lock(); > > > > > + rc = __ethtool_get_link_ksettings(netdev, &lksettings); > > > > > + rtnl_unlock(); > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
