On 13/06/2017 00:18, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 12:09:29AM +0300, Artemy Kovalyov wrote:
On 12/06/2017 23:50, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:38:09PM +0300, Artemy Kovalyov wrote:
On 12/06/2017 19:38, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 09:42:44AM +0300, Artemy Kovalyov wrote:
enum ibv_srq_type {
IBV_SRQT_BASIC,
- IBV_SRQT_XRC
+ IBV_SRQT_XRC,
+ IBV_SRQT_TAG_MATCHING
};
Please put trailing commas on all these enum changes in all patches
So do we drop overboard all -Wpedantic users?
Eh? Try it.
You only get warnings if your compiler is running in c89 or ansi mode,
which went 'overboard' a long time ago.
Bare -Wpedantic -Werror fails with this.
You need -std=c99 on older compilers.
That was my point - implying new standards' ubiquity we narrowing
compatibility.
I not insist, just want to clarify whether this code standard was chosen
for the project.
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html