On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 06:39:40PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 06:57:59PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote: > > On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 12:02 -0400, David Miller wrote: > > > From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 14:43:58 +0300 > > > > > > > Hi Dave and Doug, > > > > > > > > This series introduces some small updates and FPGA support to the > > > mlx5 > > > > core/ethernet and IB drivers. > > > > > > > > For more details please see below. > > > > > > > > Please pull and let me know if there's any problem. > > > > > > Ok, I've pulled this into net-next. > > > > > > Doug let me know if there are any merge hassles we need to coordinate > > > on. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > Will do. But is the question of a possible revert settled? Because > > once I pull, a revert means I have to pull all the way up to the revert > > as well... > > Revert is unlikely to happen, Saeed is working with Alexey to resolve > his raised concerns. I still think the direction is absolutely wrong. Reinventing fpga interfaces via nic driver is no-go. mlx needs to send a patch to revert it to show that they are willing to listen to the community. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html