Re: [PATCH rdma-core] libibumad: clean up htonll/ntohnll handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:17:22AM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> Only ntohll was being checked to see if it wasn't defined, and was then
> redefining htonll as well as ntohll. This was causing some problems for
> the compile of the opa-ff package. Simple enough to rearrange this code a
> bit such that htonll and ntohll are handled entirely independent of one
> another.
>
> Reported-by: Honggang Li <honli@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  libibumad/umad.h | 10 ++++++----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>

Thanks, applied.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux