Re: [PATCH rdma-core] libibumad: clean up htonll/ntohnll handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/22/2017 10:17 AM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> Only ntohll was being checked to see if it wasn't defined, and was then
> redefining htonll as well as ntohll. This was causing some problems for
> the compile of the opa-ff package. Simple enough to rearrange this code a
> bit such that htonll and ntohll are handled entirely independent of one
> another.

It used to be the case that they were treated independently.

> Reported-by: Honggang Li <honli@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Hal Rosenstock <hal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux