On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 04:43:18PM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > > > > Any update here? Would love to be able to load up the new kernels without patching them every time. :) > > > > > > I would like that too, > > > > > > Max, can you send a patch? or should I? > > > > Sagi, > > > > Max is doing his best to provide a patch, unfortunately he is limited > > by various architecture implications which he needs to resolve before > > sending it. > > Well, he already sent a patch that fixes the issue. > He said that he needs additional optimization for CX5 (which I assume > doesn't need the strong fence), but that still does not change the > fact that CX4 is broken. I asked to include his patch, fix the > existing bug and incrementally optimize CX5. > > What do you mean by architecture implications? it's broken and there is > a request from the community to fix it. Are you suggesting that it > doesn't solve the issue? I understand you and both Max and me are feeling the same as you. For more than 2 months, we constantly (almost on daily basis) asked for a solution from architecture group, but received different answers. The proposals were extremely broad from need for strong fence for all cards to no need for strong fence at all. Thanks >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
