Re: [PATCH] rdma-core: define link speed and link width enums

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 9:42 PM, Jason Gunthorpe
<jgunthorpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 08:17:06PM +0530, Devesh Sharma wrote:
>> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 7:35 PM, Dennis Dalessandro
>> <dennis.dalessandro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On 05/08/2017 09:54 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 09:44:17AM -0400, Devesh Sharma wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Currently application either need to define its own enum
>> >>> values for link-speed and link-width or use hard coded
>> >>> values. This patch inharits the enums from kernel space
>> >>> ib_verbs.h and puts into verbs.h for ease of programming.
>> >>>
>> >>> Signed-off-by: Devesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >>>  libibverbs/examples/devinfo.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
>> >>>  libibverbs/verbs.h            | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>> >>>  2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I think the better approach will be move these defines from
>> >> include/rdma/ib_verbs.h to include/uapi/rdma/ib_user_verbs.h
>> >> and reuse ib_user_verbs.h file directly in libibverbs.
>> >
>> >
>> > I agree on this. Please put this stuff in the uapi header file and include
>> > that in user space.
>>
>> Done, will post a V1 with 2 patches...
>
> Relying on the kernel header from a uapi header means that we now
> require the distro to have a sufficient version of that kernel header.
Which means we need to have a mechanism to track the versions.
is relying on the ABI version is good enough or you see any blockers there..
>
> This might be OK, but you have to check to see what distros are
> including (cbuild --run-shell can help with this)
And if a given distro is not including then fall-back to current
scheme, is it okay
to have defining/un-defining compile time macros to enable/disable certain code
sections?
>
> Further, I seem to recall last time I lookd at this that using the
> kernel header was hard because there were lots of name conflicts
> that had to be resolved first. It would be great to see that done of
> course..
Thanks for the heads-up, I am still trying to understand the complete
problem, reviewing what we have
currently I will get back if there are any questions.
>
> Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux