Re: [PATCH] rxe: expose num_possible_cpus() cnum_comp_vectors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



So you say that even if rxe driver doesn't do anything with the
comp_vector parameter  passed to create cq, a ULP can benefit from rxe
reporting num_comp_vectors = number of cpus.
I can agree with that even though that IMHO the benefit deepens on how
the real eth device handles received packets.

Acked-by: Moni Shoua <monis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

thanks




On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>> Because that can change on the fly and should not effect on
>>> the number of logical completion vectors rxe exposes.
>>>
>>> --
>>
>> BTW, what will be the affect of this if rxe driver doesn't use the
>> comp_vector parameter in create_cq()?
>
>
> Some ULPs won't create more queue-pairs than what the rdma device
> supports (per multi-queue session). One example for that exists in a
> patch set I submitted for exposing to ULPs IRQ affinity mappings
> through the RDMA core so they in turn can make smart assignment
> decisions for queue<->cpu mappings in a multi-queue environment.
>
> I think its safe to assume that any modern HCA drivers supports a fair
> share of completion vectors.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux