On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Erez Shitrit <erezsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> thanks for the info. Is this bug there since ipoib/bonding day one (and hence my bug...) >> or was indeed introduced later? if later, can you explain how >> fc791b633515 introduced that or you only know it by bisection? > commit "fc791b633515" changes the size of the dev_hardlen to be 24 and > required 24 extra bytes in the skb, before it was only 4, if skb is > aligned to eth "mode" it already has 14 bytes for hard-header. > So only after that commit we have the issue. If got you right, Paolo's commit introduced a regression, so we (I guess you and Paolo) need to either solve it or we (community) should consider a revert, please suggest. The bug is now in stable and distro kernels, so please act. Or. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
