On Wed, 2017-04-05 at 17:09 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > Hi Doug, > > This patchset mostly comes from Erez with one exception in the first > patch. > > That patch origins from two different commits, first from Niranjana > who added > RDMA netdev interface and second from Erez who added IPoIB support. > > During the preparation to submission, I squashed their commits into > one > and refactored code to allow submission as a standalone topic without > creating > dependecies between different submissions. This caused to change in > author line. > I hope that it doesn't really matter and it won't stop you from > merging it. > > Per-your request, I based this patch set on v4.11-rc3. > > Changes from V0: > ---------------------- > 1. ipoib_priv function returns struct ipoib_dev_priv * instead of > void > 2. Move all the refactoring of netdev_priv to be in single patch > 3. Change the name of the Formation commit. > 4. Remove unneeded blank lines > 5. Set rn->hca on creation. > 6. Return -EOPNOTSUPP instead of ENOTSUPP > 7. Remove hunk with DMA from ib_device struct. > > Thanks, > Leon > > CC: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@xxxxxxxxx> > CC: Alex Vesker <valex@xxxxxxxxxxxx> I pulled the mlx5 changes for this from DaveM's net-next tree, then applied the Intel VNIC patches, then applied these patches (which results in conflicts between your first patch and Intel's patches). I hand fixed those conflicts, so I would double check that you are happy with how I laid out the struct elements and what not. Otherwise, thanks, series applied. -- Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx> GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
