On 4/12/2017 10:49 AM, Honggang LI wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:34:47AM -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote: >> On 4/12/2017 10:18 AM, Honggang LI wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 09:34:20AM -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote: >>>> On 4/12/2017 9:29 AM, Honggang LI wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 09:49:44AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 11:28:53PM +0800, Honggang LI wrote: >>>>>>> From: Honggang Li <honli@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> According to InfiniBand Architecture Release 1.2.1, Table 208 >>>>>>> Example PathRecord Request MAD Header Fields, MADHeader:Method >>>>>>> should setup to 0x12 (SubnAdmGetTable()). >>>>>> >>>>>> That is just an example, Table 192 shows that Get and GetTable are >>>>>> both valid query types. >>>>> >>>>> I don't understand this as "Table 192 PortInfoRecord" seems nothing to >>>>> do with PathRecord request. >>>> >>>> In IBA 1.3 volume 1, it's Table 209 Subnet Administration >>>> Attribute/Method Map shows PathRecord methods are Get and GetTable. >>>> >>> >>> http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/product-briefs/truescale-infiniband-12300-switch-brief.pdf >>> Interoperability >>> • Compliant with IBTA* specifications 1.0a, 1.1, 1.2, and 1.2. >>> >>> It seems the embedded subnet manager does not support IBA 1.3 >> >> It's same for IBA 1.2.1. This part hasn't changed. >> >>>>>> >>>>>> I however expect that the SM will fail when using GetTable if the >>>>>> query returns more than one result, could that be what is happening? >>>>>> When you convert it to GET_TABLE does it return more than one result? >>>>> >>>>> strace output shows srptools always received MAD packet in 320 bytes. So >>>>> the embedded subnet manager only returns one result. >>>> >>>> What is MAD status ? >>> >>> ib_user_mad->status = 0x0 >>> >>> I attached the MAD packet dump out with strace. Please see the >>> attachments p4.in amd p4.decode. >> >> p4.decode has: >> rp_dm_rmpp_sa_mad->method = 0x81 //IB_MAD_METHOD_GET_RESP >> opensm/include/iba/ib_types.h // GetResp() Method (13.4.5) >> >> Proper response to GetTable (0x12) method is GetTableResponse (0x92) >> method but this is GetResp (0x81) response. > > Yes, you are right. p4.decode was captured with unpatched upstream srptools-1.0.3. against the embedded SM ? If so, this response looks (mostly) good to me and should be accepted by srp_daemon. I think I see the issue in srp_daemon: it's due to the check of the attribute offset which is not being set in the response: size = ib_get_attr_size(in_sa_mad->attr_offset); if (!size) { if (config->verbose) printf("PathRec Query did not find any targets " "over P_Key %x\n", pkey); continue; } p4.decode has: srp_dm_rmpp_sa_mad->attr_offset = 0x0 Since a get rather than get table is being used, a good MAD status means that a valid PR was returned and there is no need for this check. Would you try using the original get method without this code block and verify that it works with the embedded SM ? Thanks. -- Hal > p4-184.decode was created with patched srptools-1.0.3. >> >> -- Hal >> >>>> >>>> -- Hal >>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Jason >>>>> -- >>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in >>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in >>>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
