>> @@ -270,13 +268,14 @@ int qib_init_pportdata(struct qib_pportdata *ppd, struct qib_devdata *dd, >> if (!ppd->congestion_entries) >> goto bail_1; >> >> - size = sizeof(struct cc_table_shadow); >> - ppd->ccti_entries_shadow = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL); >> + ppd->ccti_entries_shadow = kzalloc(sizeof(*ppd->ccti_entries_shadow), >> + GFP_KERNEL); >> if (!ppd->ccti_entries_shadow) >> goto bail_2; >> >> - size = sizeof(struct ib_cc_congestion_setting_attr); >> - ppd->congestion_entries_shadow = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL); >> + ppd->congestion_entries_shadow = kzalloc(sizeof(*ppd >> + ->congestion_entries_shadow), >> + GFP_KERNEL); > > Not related to this patch but is related to your patch-set - can you check > the array allocations in lines 264 and 268? Do you refer to source code places here which are affected by the update step "[PATCH 4/5] IB/qib: Use kcalloc() in qib_init_pportdata()"? > Besides that: > Reviewed-by: Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia@xxxxxxxxxx> Do you find the proposed change for the shown data types really acceptable in these function calls? Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
