We have some internal tools that check for multilib-clean packaging, and
they're unhappy with ibacm:
Report from TEST_MULTILIB:
[BAD] [ibacm] Subpackage ibacm is not multilib-clean for x86_64 vs i686:
2 files have non-equal 32/64bit content:
/usr/share/man/man7/ibacm_prov.7.gz
/etc/rdma/ibacm_opts.cfg
----8<----
ibacm_prov.7.gz on x86_64 vs i686:
...
-2. be installed under a configured directory, eg., /usr/lib64/ibacm;
+2. be installed under a configured directory, eg., /usr/lib/ibacm;
...
----8<----
Similar for ibacm_opts.cfg:
-# provider_lib_path /usr/lib64/ibacm
+# provider_lib_path /usr/lib/ibacm
Not sure what the ideal resolution is for this. I'd rather not put in
the wrong path for one arch or the other, and I think lib64 isn't used
universally by all 64-bit distros.
--
Jarod Wilson
jarod@xxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
