On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 09:02:17AM -0600, Steve Wise wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 12:31:43PM +0530, Ganesh Goudar wrote: > > > Enable the use of dsgl by default and determine whether dsgl is > > > supported from lld info. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Steve Wise <swise@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Bharat Potnuri <bharat@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Ganesh Goudar <ganeshgr@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/mem.c | 6 +++--- > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/mem.c > > b/drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/mem.c > > > index 410408f..8db7a11 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/mem.c > > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/mem.c > > > @@ -38,9 +38,9 @@ > > > > > > #include "iw_cxgb4.h" > > > > > > -int use_dsgl = 0; > > > +int use_dsgl = 1; > > > module_param(use_dsgl, int, 0644); > > > -MODULE_PARM_DESC(use_dsgl, "Use DSGL for PBL/FastReg (default=0)"); > > > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(use_dsgl, "Use DSGL for PBL/FastReg (default=1)"); > > > > Can we get rid of this module parameter completely? > > We can, but we would need to deprecate it for a release or two. I believe > removing them cold-turkey isn't recommended because it represents a form of user > interface... You can rename it to be deprecated_use_dsgl instead of use_dsgl and wait for a couple of years to see if someone complains. Thanks > >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature