RE: v4.11 mlx5 regression

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Bart, Laurence,

In middle of debugging/using setup right now for other issue.
I am basically using nvme-rdma target mode code and somewhere in path of MR or QP setup it fails.
I am suspecting MR because QP1 creation has passed.
I will get to the bottom of this to provide traces tomorrow.

Parav


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Laurence Oberman [mailto:loberman@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 2:14 PM
> To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Parav Pandit <parav@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> dledford@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: v4.11 mlx5 regression
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Bart Van Assche" <Bart.VanAssche@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: parav@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dledford@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 3:00:44 PM
> > Subject: Re: v4.11 mlx5 regression
> >
> > On Tue, 2017-02-28 at 19:53 +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> > > I am using Linux-block tree testing on x86_64.
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git
> > >
> > > Commit ac1820fb286b552b6885d40ab34f1e59b815f1f1 introduced
> dma_ops
> > > related change that you made.
> > > With this change I am hitting below error in mlx5_ib driver.
> > > "DMAR: Allocating domain for mlx5_0 failed"
> > >
> > > I revert back to commit edccb59429657b09806146339e2b27594c1d1da0.
> > > With revert I do not hit the error.
> > >
> > > I do not have cycles to debug/fix this currently. Do you think this
> > > might be related to your change?
> >
> > Hello Parav,
> >
> > Since I do not have access to an mlx5 setup I hope that you realize
> > that without a bisect your report is useless to me.
> >
> > Bart.--
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma"
> > in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More
> majordomo
> > info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
> 
> Hello Parav,
> 
> I had tested all of Barts recent commits with mlx5.
> Read/write direct/buffered small and large I/O.
> They all passed for me.
> 
> If you give me a little more detail on your test I will see what I find in my test
> bed here.
> 
> Regards
> Laurence
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���fk��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux