----- Original Message ----- > From: "Max Gurtovoy" <maxg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Leon Romanovsky" <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Laurence Oberman" <loberman@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "Bart Van Assche" <Bart.VanAssche@xxxxxxxxxxx>, hch@xxxxxx, israelr@xxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, > dledford@xxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 5:00:04 AM > Subject: Re: v4.10-rc SRP + mlx5 regression > > Hi Laurence, > can you specify the test that repro these failures ? > have you tried running with CX5 HCA or only CX4 ? > I think this commit is right and we have issues in other places. > > > On 2/14/2017 8:39 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 09:19:54PM -0500, Laurence Oberman wrote: > >> > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >>> From: "Bart Van Assche" <Bart.VanAssche@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> To: leon@xxxxxxxxxx, loberman@xxxxxxxxxx > >>> Cc: hch@xxxxxx, maxg@xxxxxxxxxxxx, israelr@xxxxxxxxxxxx, > >>> linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dledford@xxxxxxxxxx > >>> Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 4:52:28 PM > >>> Subject: Re: v4.10-rc SRP + mlx5 regression > >>> > >>> On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 16:46 -0500, Laurence Oberman wrote: > >>>> I will have to run through this again and see where the bisect went > >>>> wrong. > >>> > >>> Hello Laurence, > >>> > >>> If you would be considering to repeat the bisect, did you know that a > >>> bisect > >>> can be sped up by specifying the names of the files and/or directories > >>> that > >>> are suspected? An example: > >>> > >>> git bisect start */infiniband */net > >>> > >>> Bart.-- > >>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in > >>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > >>> > >> > >> Hello Bart, > >> > >> Much better news this time :), worked late on this but got it figured out. > >> > >> OK, so we got to this one, which makes a lot more sense and is right in > >> the area where we are having issues. > >> I must have answered wrong to one of the steps the first time I did the > >> bisect. > >> > >> Reverted this in the master tree of rc8 and rebuilt the kernel > >> Now all tests pass on Linus's tree - 4.10.0_rc8+ > >> > >> The interesting point here is that this commit is in rc5 but rc5 was not > >> failing so we have an interoperability issue with this commit > >> > >> > >> [loberman@ibclient linux]$ git bisect good > >> Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this (roughly 1 step) > >> [ad8e66b4a80182174f73487ed25fd2140cf43361] IB/srp: fix mr allocation when > >> the device supports sg gaps > >> > >> [loberman@ibclient linux]$ git show > >> ad8e66b4a80182174f73487ed25fd2140cf43361 > >> commit ad8e66b4a80182174f73487ed25fd2140cf43361 > >> Author: Israel Rukshin <israelr@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Date: Wed Dec 28 12:48:28 2016 +0200 > >> > >> IB/srp: fix mr allocation when the device supports sg gaps > >> > >> If the device support arbitrary sg list mapping (device cap > >> IB_DEVICE_SG_GAPS_REG set) we allocate the memory regions with > >> IB_MR_TYPE_SG_GAPS. > >> > >> Fixes: 509c5f33f4f6 ("IB/srp: Prevent mapping failures") > >> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 4.7+ > >> Signed-off-by: Israel Rukshin <israelr@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <maxg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <markb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Reviewed-by: Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c > >> b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c > >> index 8ddc071..0f67cf9 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c > >> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c > >> @@ -371,6 +371,7 @@ static struct srp_fr_pool *srp_create_fr_pool(struct > >> ib_device *device, > >> struct srp_fr_desc *d; > >> struct ib_mr *mr; > >> int i, ret = -EINVAL; > >> + enum ib_mr_type mr_type; > >> > >> if (pool_size <= 0) > >> goto err; > >> @@ -384,9 +385,13 @@ static struct srp_fr_pool *srp_create_fr_pool(struct > >> ib_device *device, > >> spin_lock_init(&pool->lock); > >> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pool->free_list); > >> > >> + if (device->attrs.device_cap_flags & IB_DEVICE_SG_GAPS_REG) > >> + mr_type = IB_MR_TYPE_SG_GAPS; > >> + else > >> + mr_type = IB_MR_TYPE_MEM_REG; > >> + > >> for (i = 0, d = &pool->desc[0]; i < pool->size; i++, d++) { > >> - mr = ib_alloc_mr(pd, IB_MR_TYPE_MEM_REG, > >> - max_page_list_len); > >> + mr = ib_alloc_mr(pd, mr_type, max_page_list_len); > > > > First, ib_alloc_mr receives u32 as a third parameter, but int was > > supplied. Second (I can be wrong here), shouldn't max_page_list_len be > > replaced with max_fast_reg_page_list_len? > > > > Thanks > > there is a statement that: > > if (srp_dev->use_fast_reg) { > srp_dev->max_pages_per_mr = > min_t(u32, srp_dev->max_pages_per_mr, > attr->max_fast_reg_page_list_len); > } > > so we take the max_fast_reg_page_list_len in this case. > > > > >> if (IS_ERR(mr)) { > >> ret = PTR_ERR(mr); > >> if (ret == -ENOMEM) > >> (END) > >> > >> > >> So here is the revert patch, but you need to decide how you want to deal > >> with this. > >> > >> Revert "IB/srp: fix mr allocation when the device supports sg gaps" > >> Laurence Oberman > >> Traced after bisection to a cause for this failure > >> > >> Tested-by: Laurence Oberman <loberman@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: Laurence Oberman <loberman@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> commit 90d169d312a173d5350c1bb36d6daab04c592127 > >> Author: Laurence Oberman <loberman@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Date: Mon Feb 13 20:33:32 2017 -0500 > >> > >> Revert "IB/srp: fix mr allocation when the device supports sg gaps" > >> Laurence Oberman > >> Traced after bisection to a cause for this failure > >> > >> [ 130.437603] mlx5_0:dump_cqe:262:(pid 3812): dump error cqe > >> [ 130.437682] scsi host1: ib_srp: failed RECV status WR flushed (5) > >> for CQE ffff8817f0edbfb0 > >> [ 130.510899] 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 > >> [ 130.536455] 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 > >> [ 130.561878] 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 > >> [ 130.585904] 00000000 0f007806 2500002a db0ec4d0 > >> [ 145.842925] fast_io_fail_tmo expired for SRP port-1:1 / host1. > >> [ 146.530439] scsi host1: ib_srp: reconnect succeeded > >> [ 146.566629] mlx5_0:dump_cqe:262:(pid 3293): dump error cqe > >> [ 146.597635] 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 > >> [ 146.623545] 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 > >> [ 146.649599] 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 > >> [ 146.673938] 00000000 0f007806 25000032 000c46d0 > >> [ 146.697969] scsi host1: ib_srp: failed FAST REG status memory > >> management operation error (6) for CQE ffff88 > >> [ 162.225247] fast_io_fail_tmo expired for SRP port-1:1 / host1. > >> [ 162.256337] scsi host1: ib_srp: reconnect succeeded > >> [ 162.293396] scsi host1: ib_srp: failed RECV status WR flushed (5) > >> for CQE ffff8817f0412ef0` > >> > >> This reverts commit ad8e66b4a80182174f73487ed25fd2140cf43361. > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c > >> b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c > >> index 79bf484..01338c8 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c > >> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c > >> @@ -371,7 +371,6 @@ static struct srp_fr_pool *srp_create_fr_pool(struct > >> ib_device *device, > >> struct srp_fr_desc *d; > >> struct ib_mr *mr; > >> int i, ret = -EINVAL; > >> - enum ib_mr_type mr_type; > >> > >> if (pool_size <= 0) > >> goto err; > >> @@ -385,13 +384,9 @@ static struct srp_fr_pool *srp_create_fr_pool(struct > >> ib_device *device, > >> spin_lock_init(&pool->lock); > >> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pool->free_list); > >> > >> - if (device->attrs.device_cap_flags & IB_DEVICE_SG_GAPS_REG) > >> - mr_type = IB_MR_TYPE_SG_GAPS; > >> - else > >> - mr_type = IB_MR_TYPE_MEM_REG; > >> - > >> for (i = 0, d = &pool->desc[0]; i < pool->size; i++, d++) { > >> - mr = ib_alloc_mr(pd, mr_type, max_page_list_len); > >> + mr = ib_alloc_mr(pd, IB_MR_TYPE_MEM_REG, > >> + max_page_list_len); > >> if (IS_ERR(mr)) { > >> ret = PTR_ERR(mr); > >> if (ret == -ENOMEM) > >> > >> > >> > >> Now moving on to what got me here in the first place. > >> Bart, let me know if the 7 of the 8 patches in your most recent series are > >> all still valid after this revert > >> Otherwise let me know which ones you want me to apply. > >> > >> patch 6 - I am thinking i sno longer valid. > >> " > >> If a HCA supports the SG_GAPS_REG feature then a single memory > >> region of type IB_MR_TYPE_SG_GAPS is sufficient. This patch > >> reduces the number of memory regions that is allocated per SRP > >> session. > >> " > >> > >> Thanks > >> Laurence > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Hello Max, I only have CX4 and CX3 in my lab, this test bed only has CX4. CA 'mlx5_0' CA type: MT4115 Number of ports: 1 Firmware version: 12.14.2036 Hardware version: 0 Node GUID: 0x7cfe900300726ed2 System image GUID: 0x7cfe900300726ed2 Port 1: State: Active Physical state: LinkUp Rate: 100 Base lid: 3 LMC: 0 SM lid: 3 Capability mask: 0x2651e84a Port GUID: 0x7cfe900300726ed2 Link layer: InfiniBand The test is simple, it's the same one I start with every time because it always brings out issues with mapping for large I/O sizes and mem registration if such issues exist. I have a server running LIO with memory backed LUNS. These are served via a dual port mlx5 (CX4) over ib_srpt The client mounts these LUNS via ib_srp (mlx5) and device-mapper-multipath and I run a simple dd on the XFS file system. #!/bin/bash while true do dd if=/dev/zero of=/data-$1/bigfile bs=4096k count=900 sync; rm -rf /data-$1/bigfile done Once this passes I run a suite of other tests read/write, direct and buffered. Thanks Laurence -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
