Re: [PATCHv4 net-next 0/7] net: dst_confirm replacement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon,  6 Feb 2017 23:14:10 +0200

> 	This patchset addresses the problem of neighbour
> confirmation where received replies from one nexthop
> can cause confirmation of different nexthop when using
> the same dst. Thanks to YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx>
> for tracking the dst->pending_confirm problem.

This looks good enough to apply to net-next, so I have done
so.  Thanks Julian!

> - I failed to understand the CXGB* code, I see dst_confirm()
> calls but I'm not sure dst_neigh_output() was called. For now
> I just removed the dst->pending_confirm flag and left all
> dst_confirm() calls there. Any better idea?

As I said, it is trying to confirm neighbours based upon traffic
occurring in the chips TCP offload stack.  The 'cm' in "iwch_cm.c"
means "connection manager".

We can probably get to the neigh that will end up being used
since there should be a flow key somewhere that we can use to
determine the nexthop address for neigh lookup.

> - Now may be old function neigh_output() should be restored
> instead of dst_neigh_output?

Please elaborate.

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux