Re: [PATCH v3 29/37] IB/rxe: Switch from dma_device to dev.parent

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2017-01-26 at 21:06 +0000, Boyer, Andrew wrote:
> On 1/20/17, 4:04 PM, "linux-rdma-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Bart
> Van Assche" <linux-rdma-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of
> bart.vanassche@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Prepare for removal of ib_device.dma_device.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Moni Shoua <monis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_verbs.c | 6 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > @@ -1234,7 +1234,7 @@ int rxe_register_device(struct rxe_dev *rxe)
> > 	dev->node_type = RDMA_NODE_IB_CA;
> > 	dev->phys_port_cnt = 1;
> > 	dev->num_comp_vectors = RXE_NUM_COMP_VECTORS;
> > -	dev->dma_device = rxe->ifc_ops->dma_device(rxe);
> > +	dev->dev.parent = rxe->ifc_ops->dma_device(rxe);
> > 	dev->local_dma_lkey = 0;
> > 	dev->node_guid = rxe->ifc_ops->node_guid(rxe);
> > 	dev->dma_ops = &rxe_dma_mapping_ops;
> 
> ifc_ops was recently removed, so this will be a minor merge conflict.

Hello Andrew,

Thanks for the review.

Doug, do you expect me to resolve this merge conflict by rebasing this
patch series (something Linus doesn't like) once Linus has pulled your
v4.11 pull request or are you going to explain to Linus how he should
resolve this merge conflict himself?

Thanks,

Bart.--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux