On Fri, 2017-01-13 at 18:27 +0000, Estrin, Alex wrote: > This series applied to 4.10-rc3 breaks hfi1 sdma engines. > [ 34.712343] hfi1 0000:82:00.0: hfi1_0: SDMA (0) engine error: 0x21 > state s50_HwHaltWait > [ 34.722752] hfi1 0000:82:00.0: hfi1_0: SDMA (0) descq_head: 0 > descq_tail: 3 freecnt: 2044 FLE 0 > [ 34.733933] hfi1 0000:82:00.0: hfi1_0: SDMA sdmadesc[0]: flags:--F- > addr:0x00008808248c8000 gen:0 len:36 bytes > [ 34.746595] hfi1 0000:82:00.0: hfi1_0: desc0:0x80248808248c8000 > desc1 0x0000000000000000 > [ 34.757218] hfi1 0000:82:00.0: hfi1_0: aidx: 0 amode: 0 alen: 0 > [ 34.765448] hfi1 0000:82:00.0: hfi1_0: SDMA sdmadesc[1]: flags:---- > addr:0x0000880829fd5000 gen:0 len:24 bytes > [ 34.778184] hfi1 0000:82:00.0: hfi1_0: desc0:0x0018880829fd5000 > desc1 0x0000000000000000 > [ 34.788941] hfi1 0000:82:00.0: hfi1_0: SDMA sdmadesc[2]: flags:-H-L > addr:0x0000880829fd5018 gen:0 len:440 bytes > [ 34.801849] hfi1 0000:82:00.0: hfi1_0: desc0:0x41b8880829fd5018 > desc1 0x0000000000000001 > ...etc > > BTW, what was the base for this series, as 19/26 did not apply cleanly to > 4.10-rc3? Hello Alex, Sorry for this. Can you check whether the patch below fixes this regression? diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/vt.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/vt.c index 6a81b179f631..f7fcd015ec09 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/vt.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/vt.c @@ -778,8 +778,7 @@ int rvt_register_device(struct rvt_dev_info *rdi) } /* DMA Operations */ - if (rdi->ibdev.dma_device->dma_ops == NULL) - set_dma_ops(rdi->ibdev.dma_device, &dma_virt_ops); + set_dma_ops(rdi->ibdev.dma_device, &dma_virt_ops); /* Protection Domain */ spin_lock_init(&rdi->n_pds_lock); -- 2.11.0 I will make sure that this series applies cleanly on top of v4.10-rc3 when I repost it. Bart.-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
