On Mon, 2016-12-19 at 11:42 -0500, Dennis Dalessandro wrote:
> On 12/09/2016 01:24 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > Additionally, use dma_noop_ops instead of duplicating it.
> >
> > Oops, I don't think that part actually is correct. Both rdmavt
> > and the weird intel drivers want the _virtual_ address in their dma
> > address instead of the physical one set by dma_noop_ops.
>
> Yes, Christoph is correct in that our drivers use the virtual address.
> It would require more changes in the rest of the driver to make it use
> the physical address. Possible I think, but more work.
Hello Denny,
Once the v4.10 merge window has closed and v4.10-rc1 is out I will
repost this patch series. I will make sure when I repost this patch
series that the DMA code for the RDMA drivers touched by this patch
series uses virtual addresses instead of physical.
Bart.��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���fk��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
