On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 09:04:44AM +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 12/13/2016 08:44 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 08:03:03AM +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > > On 11/16/2016 09:39 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > @@ -745,13 +746,17 @@ int rxe_requester(void *arg)
> > > > wqe->status = IB_WC_LOC_PROT_ERR;
> > > > wqe->state = wqe_state_error;
> > > >
> > > > -complete:
> > > > - if (qp_type(qp) != IB_QPT_RC) {
> > > > - while (rxe_completer(qp) == 0)
> > > > - ;
> > > > - }
> > > > -
> > > > - return 0;
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * IBA Spec. Section 10.7.3.1 SIGNALED COMPLETIONS
> > > > + * ---------8<---------8<-------------
> > > > + * ...Note that if a completion error occurs, a Work Completion
> > > > + * will always be generated, even if the signaling
> > > > + * indicator requests an Unsignaled Completion.
> > > > + * ---------8<---------8<-------------
> > > > + */
> > > > + wqe->wr.send_flags |= IB_SEND_SIGNALED;
> > > > + __rxe_do_task(&qp->comp.task);
> > > > + return -EAGAIN;
> > >
> > > Hello Leon and Yonatan,
> > >
> > > Sorry for the late reply but I think setting IB_SEND_SIGNALED for WQE's
> > > reporting a completion error is wrong.
> >
> > I'm not clear about it. I didn't find in spec what to do with IB_SEND_SIGNALED
> > flag in case of error.
> >
> > According to spec:
> > "C10-91: The CI shall generate a CQE when a Work Request
> > completed under any of the following conditions:
> > • The Work Request completed in error"
>
> Hello Leon,
>
> To me that paragraph from the spec means that do_complete() is wrong. And
> once do_complete() is fixed, callers that set the WQE status to "error" no
> longer have to set IB_SEND_SIGNALED.
Thanks,
It looks like a right thing to do. Yonatan is handling it.
>
> Bart.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
