On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 10:31:00AM +0100, Jinpu Wang wrote: > > I do have a concern about accessing non-cached port data as part > > of this call. Can we cache the port state and use that instead? > > Thanks for review. > > Sure, I updated the v2 patch as attached, is this what you want? > > Note: in cma_resolve_loopback, it does the same, I leave it like that > for now, I can also update this part if you like. I feel like we already have a cache for subnet prefix, or maybe another patch series added one? Can't remember, sorry. In any event, this caching should probably live in the core code not the cma.... Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
