On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 12:01:13AM +0200, Yishai Hadas wrote: > >I'm not sure where we are in the release cycle right now.. Doug - if > >we didn't make a release with the 1.3 symbol tag (this was created > >just before rdma-core) then this should go into 1.3 when it gets > >merged.. > > Jason, > You pointed to use 1.4, the series followed that. Yes, but I realized we may not have made a ibverbs release before starting rdma-core. > Doug, > Can you please comment here ? we should have a clear definition what defined > to be a "release" which requires a new number. > In case we want to use 1.3 please let me know if I need to re-spin or you > will change as part of the merge. Doug/Leon/You have to check this stuff before merging any series that touches a map file, beacuse it depends on when in the cycle the patch gets merged. After the first rdma-core release is done we should denote the map stanzas with a comment indicating which release number they are for so it is easier to keep track. eg we are nearing the release for 4.9, so presumably Doug will tag a rdma-core relase soon. If this series does not make that cutoff 1.4 would be correct. Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
