On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 12:05:09PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 06:13:50PM -0800, Vishwanathapura, Niranjana wrote:
In order to be truely device independent the hfi_vnic ULP should not depend
on a device exported symbol. Instead device should register its functions
with the ULP. Hence the approaches a) and b).
It is not device independent, it is hard linked to hfi1, just like our
other multi-component drivers.. So don't worry about that.
We would like to keep the design clean and avoid any tight coupling here (our
original design in this series tackled these).
Any strong reason not to go with a) or b) ?
Niranjana
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
