>
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 04:51:27PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>
> > +static inline bool rdma_protocol_raw_packet(const struct ib_device *device,
u8
> port_num)
> > +{
> > + return device->port_immutable[port_num].core_cap_flags &
> RDMA_CORE_CAP_PROT_RAW_PACKET;
> > +}
>
> Does the mlx drivers really register ports with different capabilities
> as the same ib_device? I'm not sure that should be allowed.
>
> I keep talking about how we need to get rid of the port_num in these
> sorts of places because it makes no sense...
>
I agree. Requiring the port number has implications that ripple up into the
rdma-rw api as well...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
