On Sat Nov 05 2016 14:24:17 GMT-0700 (PDT), Doug Ledford wrote: > On 11/5/16 11:38 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 09:03:07AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > Oh, I wanted to ask about the name - we have two 'pv' drivers now, > > > should this be called pvrdma_vmware or something? Is there a > > > convention for this in other parts of the kernel? > > > > Yes, it should, even if we have no exact convention. > > > > Agreed. I hate how long the driver name will end up being, but pvrdma_ > as a prefix sounds appropriate. > Hi Jason/Doug, I wasn't aware that there was another paravirtual RDMA driver being upstreamed. Maybe I missed it in the linux-rdma list? Shouldn't this be a vendor choice since it would depend on how they want to name their driver as long as it doesn't clash with any existing ones? Thanks, Adit -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
