On Tue, 2016-10-25 at 13:20 -0500, Steve Wise wrote:
> >
> > On 10/24/2016 12:09 PM, Steve Wise wrote:
> > >
> > > + rej_msg = rdma_reject_msg(cm_id, status);
> > > + rej_data = (struct nvme_rdma_cm_rej *)
> > > + rdma_consumer_reject_data(cm_id, ev,
> > > &rej_data_len);
> >
> > Please reorder the patches in this patch series such that it
> > doesn't
> > break a bisect. rdma_consumer_reject_data() should be introduced
> > before
> > it is used.
>
> rdma_consumer_reject_data() is introduced in patch 3.
Hello Steve,
Thanks for the feedback. Apparently my e-mail client displayed the
patches in the wrong order ...
Bart.��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���fk��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
