RE: New providers in rdma-core

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Perhaps aided by a macro so we get high uniformity:
> 
> #define DECLARE_DRIVER_UDATA(struct_driver, struct_common)
>   struct user # struct_driver {
>      struct struct_common ibv_resp;
>      struct struct_driver udata;
>   };
> 
> Where mlx4_alloc_ucontext_resp_v3 comes from the uapi header, and is not
> inlined, so each driver gets an 'abi wrapper' header that just builds all these
> structs.

The idea looks good to me.
But still, I'm missing something - in order for libraries and the kernel to use the 
same headers they should reside in the same repository.
Is that the long-term goal? And wouldn't that be mixing user/kernel spaces?

Thanks,
Ram

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux