On Tuesday, October 18, 2016 9:47:31 AM CEST Haggai Eran wrote:
> On 10/18/2016 1:05 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > @@ -1309,7 +1311,7 @@ static bool validate_net_dev(struct net_device *net_dev,
> > static struct net_device *cma_get_net_dev(struct ib_cm_event *ib_event,
> > const struct cma_req_info *req)
> > {
> > - struct sockaddr_storage listen_addr_storage, src_addr_storage;
> > + struct sockaddr_storage listen_addr_storage = {}, src_addr_storage = {};
>
> Doesn't this still translate to an extra initialization that Doug was
> worried about?
Thanks for spotting this. I must have screwed up while rebasing the patch
at some point, this one change should not be there, the other changes by
themselves sufficiently address the warning.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
