On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:11:54AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:51:59AM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: > > > > 3. Does it make sense to rename glue/ to be packages/ and move debian there? > > > > That, or as Jason has suggested, just have a top-level redhat directory, > > same as the debian one. Don't really care much what it's called, just as > > long as we can get (at least most of) this stuff into the tree, rather > > than having it lingering in our own special package. > > The debian/ directory has to be top level for debian tools, so I'm > inclined to just follow the pattern and go with redhat/. Okay, good, my vague recollection of that was correct. > I think it is no problem to take what you have right away, but lets > try to move as much as is trivial/sensible into common places. I'm shuffling things around locally to redhat/ and have pulled in your Docs install change. Want me to finish cleaning up, double-check that it all builds, and ship a v2 set? > Maybe we can tackle the larger questions (eg systemd) later.. Some of these issues might be better addressed once more distros have had a chance to digest the new package and see what they still need. Entirely possible others have a similar pile of glue for their distro, including generic parts, and their generic parts are more polished than ours. -- Jarod Wilson jarod@xxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
