On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 07:22:54AM -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> > +
> > static struct acmp_dest *
> > acmp_acquire_dest(struct acmp_ep *ep, uint8_t addr_type, const uint8_t *addr)
> > {
> > @@ -366,6 +376,16 @@ acmp_acquire_dest(struct acmp_ep *ep, uint8_t addr_type, const uint8_t *addr)
> > acm_log(2, "%s\n", log_data);
> > lock_acquire(&ep->lock);
> > dest = acmp_get_dest(ep, addr_type, addr);
> > + if (dest && dest->state == ACMP_READY &&
> > + dest->addr_timeout != 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF) {
>
> Nit related to the timeout check:
> In acmp.c, (uint64_t)~0ULL is used in other places for this. Should this
> addr_timeout check be changed to some infinite or no timeout define
> along with the other occurrences for consistency and better code
> readability ?
Will do.
>
> -- Hal
>
> > + acm_log(2, "Record valid for the next %ld minute(s)\n",
> > + dest->addr_timeout - time_stamp_min());
> > + if (time_stamp_min() >= dest->addr_timeout) {
> > + acm_log(2, "Record expired\n");
> > + acmp_remove_dest(ep, dest);
> > + dest = NULL;
> > + }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
