On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 11:46:36AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 03:48:02PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > > Folks can decide how much of this stuff should go on into the main > > > repository later on.. > > > > I completely missed that tooling branch. It looks like it misses the > > Debian image. > > Only 'make' works for Debian. There is no .deb packaging yet. I have just pushed sample Debian packaging, please let me know what you think. The DEB stuff is much closer to production ready than the RPM example, and illistrates my proposed package split: ibverbs-providers_11-1_amd64.deb ibverbs-utils_11-1_amd64.deb iwpmd_11-1_amd64.deb libibcm-dev_1.0.11-1_amd64.deb libibcm1-dbg_1.0.11-1_amd64.deb libibcm1_1.0.11-1_amd64.deb libibumad-dev_3.1.11-1_amd64.deb libibumad3-dbg_3.1.11-1_amd64.deb libibumad3_3.1.11-1_amd64.deb libibverbs-dev_1.2.11-1_amd64.deb libibverbs1-dbg_1.2.11-1_amd64.deb libibverbs1_1.2.11-1_amd64.deb librdmacm-dev_1.1.11-1_amd64.deb librdmacm1-dbg_1.1.11-1_amd64.deb librdmacm1_1.1.11-1_amd64.deb rdmacm-utils_11-1_amd64.deb srptools_11-1_amd64.deb Debian will be able to gain 5 new providers, iwpmd and a spattering of newer versions. Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
