On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 10:04:12PM -0400, ira.weiny wrote: > > However, the my point remains, it still clashes with what MOFED does, > > and the idea of two vendors not stomping on each other is still > > ficitional. > > How does it conflict with MOFED if we do _not_ change libmlx*, libibumad, > librdmacm, libibverbs, and only add an updated hfi1.ko? MOFED ships new core kernel modules, so I doubt hfi1.ko will load after MOFED is installed. MOFED has historically shipped a libibverbs that does not follow upstream's ABI in subtle ways. I would not anticipate that your libhfi1-rdmav2 would work fully correctly either. They may even ship libhfi1 since it is in OFED and they are deriving from OFED. I haven't checked. Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
