Re: Question on RDMA atomic operations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Aug 24, 2016, at 11:43 PM, Dong Young Yoon <dyoon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> My name is Dong Young and I am a PhD student at the University of Michigan.
> Recently, we have been working on a research topic related to RDMA and had an observation where there is a race condition between RDMA atomic operations (e.g., fetch-and-add) and RDMA 1-sided writes.
> We would like to verity whether what we observed is actually true (i.e., no atomicity guaranteed between RDMA atomic operation and RDMA read/write).
Hi Dong,

If you post an atomic operation followed by RDMA read/write, you need a fence between the two, because the second one might start processing before the first one has completed processing. 

In order to do that, you need to set the IBV_SEND_FENCE in the send_flags of the wr.

> Is it really true? I have also contacted other fellow researchers who worked on RDMA, but they do not seem to be 100% sure on this matter.
> Thank you so much in advance for your help.
> 
> Thanks,
> Dong Young--
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux